Lesson 10 *August 30-September 5
Read for This Week’s Study: Matt. 5:17-19, 5:21-44, Mark 7:9-13, Matt. 19:16-22.
If you love Me, keep My commandments
(John 14:15, NKJV).
Though many leaders in Israel highly exalted the law, some
misunderstood its purpose, believing that they could obtain
righteousness by obeying the law. As Paul was to write:
they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to
establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto
the righteousness of God (Rom. 10:3).
This is why Jesus often questioned, and even disapproved of, the traditions of the religious elders (Mark 7:1-13). And their misunderstanding was why they criticized and confronted Him about His views of the law.
It is important to understand that, although Jesus criticized the openly legalistic practices of the Pharisees, He exalted the Ten Commandments, clearly affirming the perpetuity of the Decalogue and explaining its meaning and purpose. Christ Himself said that He had come to fulfill the law (Matt. 5:17). In many ways, His death was the ultimate revelation of the continued validity of God’s law.
This week we will analyze Jesus’ teachings in regard to the law and the impact His teachings should have in our lives.
*Study this week’s lesson to prepare for Sabbath, September 6.
Sunday August 31
What does Matthew 5:17-19 teach about Jesus’ attitude toward the law?
Although the word law is often used to
refer to the first five books of the Bible (also known as Pentateuch or
Torah), in this case the context seems to indicate
that He was referring primarily to the Ten Commandments. When saying He
had not come to
destroy the law, Jesus is literally
saying, I have not come to make invalid or abolish the Ten
Commandments. His statement is very clear and probably meant
to show that it was the religious elders, not He, who had been
destroying the law, reducing its effect through their tradition (see
Matt. 15:3, 6). In contrast, by filling
it with a deeper meaning, Christ had come to
the law, thus giving us an example of what perfect obedience to the
will of God looks like. (See Rom. 8:3-4.)
Read Acts 7:38. Who was the Angel who spoke to Moses and gave him the law on Mount Sinai? (See Isa. 63:9, 1 Cor. 10:4.) Why is this important?
Christ was not only the leader of the Hebrews in the
wilderness . . . but it was He who gave the law to Israel. Amid the
awful glory of Sinai, Christ declared in the hearing of all the people
the ten precepts of His Father’s law. It was He who gave to Moses the
law engraved upon the tables of stone. — Ellen G. White, Patriarchs
and Prophets, p. 366.
The fact that Christ Himself gave the law to Moses on Mount Sinai makes it even more important for us to take it seriously. Also, if the Lawgiver Himself further explained it through His teachings, as we find in the Gospels, we would do well to obey that law. One would be hard pressed to find in the life and teachings of Jesus anything implying that the Ten Commandments are not binding on Christians. On the contrary, His words and example teach us the opposite.
Though we know that the law is still binding, we also know that it does not, indeed cannot, save us. (See Gal. 3:21.) How then do we understand the relationship between law and grace?
Monday September 1
After establishing the perpetuity of the Ten Commandments, Jesus continued His Sermon on the Mount, now setting forth a few specific examples of Old Testament laws. People had so greatly misunderstood these specific commandments that Jesus felt the vital need of explaining their true meaning.
What contrast did Jesus make with each aspect of the law mentioned in the Sermon on the Mount? To what authority did He appeal in each case? Matt. 5:21-44.
Note that in each instance Jesus first cites an Old Testament text (Exod. 20:13-14; Deut. 5:17-18; Exod. 21:24; Lev. 24:20; Deut. 19:21) and then appears to argue against it. Was Jesus discrediting the law? Of course not. By further explaining and expanding what the religious leaders had narrowed down to nothing but formality, He was simply contrasting the teachings of the Pharisees with the true meaning of the law.
The rabbis cited tradition as their authority for their
interpretation of the law. In contrast, Christ spoke on His own
authority, as the Lawgiver Himself. The expression
but I say
unto you appears six times in this chapter. Who alone but the
Lord Himself could rightly make a claim like that?
What’s fascinating, too, is that Christ’s requirements went radically beyond the simple form of the law. His teachings included the spirit behind the letter of the law. The spirit that imparts meaning and life to what otherwise can only be pure formalism. Law-keeping, in and of itself, as an end in itself, leads to nothing but death if the law is not understood as an expression of what it means to be saved by grace.
Consider the scribes’ and Pharisees’ attitudes as described in Matthew 23:3-5, 23-28. How can we obey God’s commandments wholeheartedly without falling into similar hypocrisy and legalism? What crucial role does understanding grace play in sparing us from legalism?
Tuesday September 2
How did Jesus expand the meaning of the law, as seen in Matthew 5:27-28? What did He say in Matthew 5:29-30? How are we to take these words?
In this passage Christ referred to two commandments: the seventh and the tenth. Until then, the Israelites considered adultery to be only the overt physical sexual act with another person’s spouse. Jesus points out that in reality, because of the tenth commandment, adultery would include lustful thoughts and desires, as well.
In Matthew 5:29-30, Christ was using a figure of speech. Of course, one could argue that it would be better to go through life mutilated than to forfeit eternity with Christ. However, rather than pointing to mutilation, which would be contrary to other biblical teachings (see Lev. 19:27-28; Lev. 21:17-20), Jesus was referring to the control of one’s thoughts and impulses. In His references to plucking out an eye or cutting off a hand, Christ was figuratively speaking of the importance of taking resolute decisions and actions toward guarding oneself against temptation and sin.
What did the Pharisees ask Jesus in Matthew 19:3, and why was it a trick question? (See vs. 7.) What was Jesus’ answer? See Matt. 19:4-9; compare with Matt. 5:31-32.
Both texts (Matt. 5:31 and 19:7) are
citing Deuteronomy 24:1. In Jesus’ days there were two rabbinic schools
that interpreted this text in two different ways: Hillel understood it
to allow divorce for almost any reason, while Shammai interpreted it to
mean only explicit adultery. The Pharisees were trying to trick Jesus
into taking sides with one school or the other. However, they had
overlooked the fact that it was not God’s original plan for anyone to
divorce, ever, which is why Jesus said:
What God has joined
together, let not man separate (Matt. 19:6, NKJV).
Later, because of the
hardness of their hearts,
they asked why God had allowed a man to give his wife a
of divorce if he found some
uncleanness in her
(Deut. 24:1, NKJV). Christ corrected the misuse of
this passage by uplifting the sanctity and permanence of marriage: the
only cause for divorce, before God, is
fornication (in Greek porneia,
How seriously do we take Jesus’ warning about plucking out our eyes or cutting off a hand? How much stronger a warning could He have given us about what sin can do to our eternal destiny? If this warning scares you, good. It should!
Wednesday September 3
During another encounter Jesus had with the scribes and Pharisees (Matt. 15:1-20; see also Mark 7:1-13), they questioned Him about a tradition of the elders, one not found in the Law of Moses. This tradition stipulated that one should ritualistically wash his hands before eating, something Jesus’ disciples had neglected to do. Christ immediately responded by citing another tradition of the Pharisees, one that invalidated the fifth commandment.
Before analyzing Christ’s argument, we need to understand that
the tradition the Pharisees had established, called Corban,
comes from a word that means
a gift. When a man
applied the words,
It is Corban to anything, it was
considered an oath: it was something dedicated to God and the temple.
Read Mark 7:9-13. In what ways was the Pharisees’ tradition such a subtle way of violating the fifth commandment? Consider the importance of presenting offerings before God (Exod. 23:15, 34:20) and the sacredness of an oath made before the Lord (Deut. 23:21-23).
It seems as if the Pharisees had found the perfect excuse to deny one’s parents their rightful support. They had expanded the solid principles found in the Pentateuch and transformed them into man-made commandments, which, in their leader’s own thinking, could supersede one of God’s commandments.
This isn’t the only time Jesus dealt with the same spiritual
But woe to you Pharisees! For you tithe mint and
rue and all manner of herbs, and pass by justice and the love of God. These
you ought to have done, without leaving the others undone
(Luke 11:42, NKJV; emphasis supplied). They should
have kept both commands, first by honoring their father and mother,
without leaving aside their giving to the Lord.
No wonder Jesus summed up His argument by applying to the
Pharisees a description Isaiah made of the Israelites 700 years
These people draw near to Me with their mouth, and
honor Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me. And in vain
they worship Me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men
(Matt. 15:8-9, NKJV). Once again, Christ upheld the
Ten Commandments and contrasted His position with that of the Pharisees.
In what ways might you be seeking little technical loopholes in order to avoid doing what’s clearly your duty?
Thursday September 4
Read Matthew 19:16-22. From the immediate details of this specific story, what broad and important truths can we derive from this account about the law and what keeping of the law entails?
The rich young man couldn’t comprehend that salvation from sin
does not come from following the law, even strictly. It comes, rather,
from the Lawgiver, the Savior. The Israelites had known this truth
since the beginning, but they had forgotten it. Now Jesus set forth
what they should have heeded from the start: that obedience and full
surrender to God are so united that one without the other becomes only
a pretense of Christian life.
Nothing short of obedience can
be accepted. Self-surrender is the substance of the teachings of
Christ. Often it is presented and enjoined in language that seems
authoritative, because there is no other way to save man than to cut
away those things which, if entertained, will demoralize the whole
being. — Ellen G. White, The Desire of Ages,
In another encounter, the Sadducees had been questioning Christ about the resurrection, and Jesus had astonished and silenced them with His answer. So, now the Pharisees gathered together, ready to make a final attempt to lead the Savior into saying something that they could interpret as being against the law. They chose a certain lawyer to question Jesus about which was the most important commandment (Matt. 22:35-40). The lawyer’s question probably arose from by the attempt of the rabbis to arrange all the commandments by order of importance. If two commands appeared to be in conflict, the one assumed to be more important took priority and left a person free to violate the less important one. The Pharisees particularly exalted the first four precepts of the Decalogue as being more important than the last six and, as a result, they failed when it came to matters of practical religion.
Jesus answered in a masterful way: first, and most important,
there must be love in the heart before anyone can begin to observe
God’s law. Obedience without love is impossible and worthless. However,
where there is true love toward God, a person will unconditionally put
his life in harmony with God’s will as expressed in all ten of His
commandments. That is why Jesus later said:
If you love Me,
keep My commandments (John 14:15, NKJV).
Friday September 5Further Study: Ellen G. White,
The Spirituality of the Law,pp. 45-78, in Thoughts From the Mount of Blessing;
The Sermon on the Mount,pp. 307-314, and
Controversy,pp. 606-609, in The Desire of Ages.
Speaking of the law, Jesus said, — Ellen
G. White, Thoughts
From the Mount of Blessing, pp.
I am not
come to destroy, but to fulfill . . .; that is, to fill up
the measure of the law’s requirement, to give an example of perfect
conformity to the will of God. . . .
“His mission was to
magnify the law, and make it honorable.
Isaiah 42:21. He was to show the spiritual nature of the law, to
present its far-reaching principles, and to make plain its eternal
obligation. . . .
“Jesus, the express image of the Father’s person, the effulgence of His glory; the self-denying Redeemer, throughout His pilgrimage of love on earth was a living representation of the character of the law of God. In His life it is made manifest that heaven-born love, Christlike principles, underlie the laws of eternal rectitude.
a moral universe.What does that mean? How is our universe a moral place? If it is, what do you think makes it so? What role would God’s law have in a moral universe? Could the universe be a moral place without God having a moral law to govern it? Discuss. How does the idea of God’s law in a moral universe help explain Satan’s attempt to undermine that law?
Muthu is a Bible teacher in an Adventist high school in southeastern India. But his ministry extends beyond the classroom. He takes students and adults to villages to hold Branch Sabbath Schools. Most of the villagers know little about Jesus.
The children come first, gathering under a tree to hear stories and sing songs. Then team members visit villagers’ homes to pray for the sick or discouraged. Eventually adults join in the meetings.
One day Muthu visited a village and discovered that heavy rain had damaged an old mud house, causing it to collapse and leaving the woman who lived there homeless. She had leprosy, and no one would go near her.
Instead of holding Branch Sabbath School, Muthu and his team cleared the debris from the home site. Soon villagers pitched in to help as well. They cut some poles and stretched a tarp over them for a temporary shelter.
During the week Muthu and his team began building a small, sturdy house for the woman. The villagers saw that no harm came to Muthu or his teammates, and they began treating the woman as one of them again. Some gave her clothes and household goods to replace what she had lost.
The next Sabbath the woman met Muthu and begged him to come to
her house. There she pointed to two large gunnysacks filled with
Those are my offering, she said. Muthu
was touched as he realized that this woman had gathered about 100
coconuts and carried them, one by one, to her little home. Her labor of
love had taken her all week.
Today a large group meets in the village for worship. The village has no church of any denomination, but they welcome the Adventists because they know these people care. The nearest church is three or four miles (five or six kilometers) away, and there is no reliable transportation. The new believers are learning to pray and are asking God for a church in their village.
Thousands of villages such as this one have only a stone god to worship. The people still wait to hear that Jesus loves them and wants to live with them forever. Our mission offerings help make it possible for these people to have a simple church in which to worship God and invite others to worship as well.
All art in these lessons and on the cover are courtesy of GoodSalt.com.
Sabbath School Lesson Copyright 2012 by the Office of the Adult Bible Study Guide,
General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists.
All Rights Reserved.
For questions and concerns about the Study Guide,
please contact the editor of the Bible Study Guide, Clifford Goldstein.